Talk:Trixie/@comment-25559529-20150820030644/@comment-25559529-20150828010129

There's a difference between pointing out a fallacy and derailing a discussion into semantics.

"Yes Blueblood could go on a murder spree and you'd find a way to justify it." "The only one making straw arguments is you with justifying Blueblood's actions. and accusing those who don't agree with you as anti-bronies" "It doesn't work when you haven’t fully justified that claim."

Does ANY of this match up with anything I said?