Talk:My Little Pony Equestria Girls/@comment-5926076-20130711174002/@comment-5513888-20130711192924

Not really. It's always going to be invalid since what I said was an assumption. Now, you did debunk my assumption, but what you said suggested I was arguing that Shining was with Cadance, as if I had concluded that, but the fact is I had assumed—theorized—that he may have been with her. I did not make any attempt to convince people that he was with her, therefore, it was not an argument.

So, in regards to the assumption that Shining had been with Cadance, your argument is invalid, because it had be inputted in something that was not an argument.