Talk:Transcripts/Sisterhooves Social/@comment-82.131.156.87-20111108174554/@comment-82.131.156.87-20111108183245

Ah yes, it would be a has.. and I Don't want to take anyone's precious time, but in this case, I can't here "has" either.. Is it just so suppressed or possible that they used "had" as an emphasis on the past?