Talk:No Second Prances/@comment-15889853-20160503052952/@comment-1142365-20160503150941

Firstly, Why does your review start out with a paragraph which basically suggests that you alone are correct on the matter, and everyone else is wrong?

Secondly, your main criticism is that all of the characters were too harsh. But that's part of the point of this episode. This episode tried to cram in a really complicated social situation into 22 minutes, one that involved a lot of mistrust and anger. So please forgive the writers for accurately depicting emotions brought about by such a situation.

Thirdly, this is definitely my favourite part of your review:

"So in the end, NSP is just as bad as I thought it would be"

Is the purpose of your review(s) to just tell the world how right you are and how your preordained opinions are justified before an episode even airs?