Talk:Magical Mystery Cure/@comment-1037137-20130327224350/@comment-1037137-20130328002410

The idea of ponies as humans or humans in Equestria should remain exclusively as fandom ideas restricted to fandom works, not on the show itself. Seems Hasbro has allowed itself to stray across the boundary of what is permissable and what is just plain out of place a little too much recently.

Even if Equestria Girls bombs, at least it won't affect the main series so it's a mistake we can eventually overlook if it does fail. But the Alicorn Princess thing is a lasting change and not one for the better. I love what ideas the fans come up with, but there's only so many you can legitimately put in the show itself. Even if fans were the first to come up with Alicorn Twilight in fanarts and stuff, I don't think it was ever meant to be taken that seriously. And even if Lauren Faust eventually planned on making Twilight Celestia's successor, why was it introduced this soon in this manner? And again, what's this going to mean for the show's setup and chemistry? And on top of that, none of these things work on Twilight. I don't view her as an alicorn and I certainly do not believe for a minute that princess is an appropriate title for her. I don't care how much little girls love their princesses, this is going beyond what is believable. We already had three princesses, that was enough for most folks? And while I do look forward to Season Four, I can't ignore what the hell this unwanted change means for it.

I want to know who at Hasbro or on the crew greenlit this idea and actually was convinced it was a good idea. Twilight's not an alicorn or a princess: She's a unicorn and a wizard, NOT royalty. Yeah they say she isn't leaving Ponyville, but you know what, I'll only believe that if I see it. And again, those lousy wings, uggh. I take it back, getting used to those is going to take a lot longer than I thought.