Talk:Scootaloo/@comment-11634302-20160906173315/@comment-27161581-20160911060102

Well you are trying to make a claim that Derpy has more character development that Scootaloo. Then this piece:

" I'm saying even some background ponies actually have more development than her. Which is saying a lot because Scootaloo is suppose to be a secondary character."

Is saying the exact same thing, but assuming that Derpy has more character development, an iffy premise to begin with. Then this gem: "It's actually hilarious when you think about it."

Which also makes the assumption that you are correct. Second verse same as the first. Now to skip to the good part: "All we know about Scootaloo is that she's a nice impatient tomboy who has friends and no familly."

We also know how she got her cutie mark, what her hobbies are, several adventures she's been on... We've seen her learn to take charge and try new things... but anyway the point Jonny Manz politely hinted at, is that you fail to bring evidence to the table to support your argument, which is something you should always do.

Now as to Herculine's remark is that she is pointing out that the action of taking an intentionally extreme opinion is also an action that is designed to garner support from a group of people who share that like minded opinion, somewhat similar to group polarization, abet in fewer and less polite words. While it may seem, and be rude to call you, Cuddlefan out on such behavior, if you fail to present insight based on observations, then it is difficult to perceive your own arguments as anything but poorly founded opinions. By posting them on a discussion you are practically begging for people to respond to it, and say "I agree."