Talk:Princess Ember/@comment-1031724-20160420051412/@comment-27161581-20160421235022

Yes, but not an insult towards you, but towards your creation, an important distinction. I was subtly remarking through my comment that some of your points were incorrect, such as point four which we have recently discussed, and point three which has the same erroneous indications as four. Furthermore since point two is partially dependent on point three, and point three is incorrect. Your original post is starting to look rather shaky. Point two has its own issue of being theoretical, such as attributing awesomeness, because the character has potential to be helpful, but is not actually helpful, hence I made the dry remark on the click-bait nature of the post; don't feel bad about it, next time just double check your facts.