Talk:Princess Cadance/@comment-1416077-20150522151917

The first line of the article incorrectly states:

"Princess Cadance is an Alicorn pony who is first featured in the season two finale alongside her husband Shining Armor."

When Candace is first introduced, Shining Armor is NOT her husband yet. The sentence clearly indicates that this is Shining Armor's first appearance as well. By stating that he is her husband, it implies that they are already married when first introduced.

The sentence should be changed, replacing "husband" with either "groom" (meaning "future husband", which is the correct term at the time), "future husband" (which is technically correct, though somewhat inaccurate), "then-groom" (which implies that they either married or called off the wedding), or omitted altogether, as his introduction is not relevant enough to be mentioned in her article's introduction (though obviously it should be mentioned in the main body of the article).

I changed the text, but the change was undone by user TheGuineaPig45 with the statement: "It's not talking about that specific episode. It is saying that Shining currently is her groom."

I'd like to posit that TheGuineaPig45's statement is incorrect in the context of the sentence in question, which is directly referring to the first appearance, not later events.

Come think of it, the first appearance of the actual Candace was NOT alongside Shining Armor; We first see the real Cadance in a flashback and next see her in the following episode, trapped alone in the caves. In both these instances, she is unmarried.