| This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page.
Direct any additional comments to Forum:Wiki discussion.
Ponies shouldn't be listed twice... –Throwy 17:10, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Oh. Sorry. Reverting. –Throwy 17:25, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
Considering that on an article for a pony, we will usually mention any different kind duplicates, we should do that with each entry on the list of ponies too so there's one entry for that pony irregardless of how many forms s/he appears in. The only issue I see is having space for only one image to use for all kinds.17:46, April 30, 2013 (UTC)
@Throwy: usually when there's already a precedent for something, you find out why there's a consensus before you go undoing things. @Cod: I think you mean "regardless". "Irregardless" is both nonstandard and contrary to the meaning you seem to wish it to have. @Discussion: Anon has been taking care of the duplicates for a while and I trust his judgment. I agree with points raised in the initial discussion that people may be looking for a certain variant of the pony and not find it if the duplicate is not listed. Plus, how do we know that two ponies who are identical in all but species are really the same pony?